THDM-CPV

Questions concerning the different calculations performed by SARAH and the output of the information into other formats
Post Reply
snickino
Posts: 6
Joined: 19. May 2017, 09:33

THDM-CPV

Post by snickino » 19. May 2017, 11:09

My name is Nick Murphy. I am trying to implement the THDM-CPV model file in SARAH and I have am having some issues. I am getting errors when trying to run ModelOutput[Eigenstates] and CheckModel. One of the errors from CheckModel I think might be important is

The following particle are not defined in ParticleDefinitions in \
particles.m: {H10,H1p,H20,H2p}

Basically, I am interested in the RGE's, and CalcRGE's ran fine, but when I tried to get them in TeX form I ran into a bunch of errors. Do you have any idea what the problem might be?

Also, is there any way to force SARAH to treat lambda5, 6 and 7 as complex in the RGE's instead of real?

Cheers!

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by FStaub » 19. May 2017, 11:21

Hi Nick,

first of all, there is already a THDM-CPV model included. I guess you want to use another basis or conventions? Concerning your questions:

1) {H10,H1p,H20,H2p} these are the gauge eigenstates, correct? This shouldn't cause any trouble for the RGE calculation, but the LaTeX output should look prettier of you define the LaTeX names. However, this is not define, it shouldn't give error messages. So, what kind of errors do you get?

2) Unfortunately not, the routines are written so far in a way that they only give for real quartics the correct results.

Cheers,
Florian

snickino
Posts: 6
Joined: 19. May 2017, 09:33

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by snickino » 19. May 2017, 11:25

Hi!

Thanks for the reply. I am in fact referring to the model file that is included in the Sarah package. I have run it straight out of the box, and I get these errors. Essentially, I was unable to produce the TeX output format because ModelOutput[Eigenstates] was not running correctly. Maybe I am just calling the functions incorrectly?

Nick

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by FStaub » 19. May 2017, 11:27

Ok, then I misunderstood what you meant by "implementing". I'll run the model and check what goes wrong.

Cheers
Florian

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by FStaub » 19. May 2017, 15:17

Hi,

there was a problem with the calculation of the Xi-dependent parts of the running VEVs. The patch is attached. Please replace the file in Package/RGEs.

Cheers,
Florian
Attachments
nonSUSYrges_beta.m
(17.09 KiB) Downloaded 147 times

snickino
Posts: 6
Joined: 19. May 2017, 09:33

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by snickino » 19. May 2017, 15:46

Thanks for the help!

However, I am still unable to produce the Tex output, and the command ModelOutput[Eigenstates] is not running properly. I am getting no vertices.

Part::partd: Part specification Particles[Eigenstates][[1,4]] is longer than depth of object. >>

I am also getting the following error for every possible type of vertex

Found 0 potential vertices. Calculating 0/0All done in 0.000956s; 0 are non-vanishing.

I am just running things incorrectly?

Cheers!
Nick

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by FStaub » 19. May 2017, 16:47

You need to insert the Eigenstates you want to study, i.e.

Code: Select all

ModelOutput[EWSB]

snickino
Posts: 6
Joined: 19. May 2017, 09:33

Re: THDM-CPV

Post by snickino » 20. May 2017, 09:30

Great, now it works. Thanks so much!

Cheers,
Nick

Post Reply