Conj in Seesaw1

Questions about the interface between SARAH and SPheno as well as the FlavorKit functionality
Post Reply
jjonesperez
Posts: 7
Joined: 22. Jun 2016, 18:53

Conj in Seesaw1

Post by jjonesperez » 19. Dec 2016, 23:55

Hi Florian,

I am working with a non-decoupled version of Seesaw1, and noticed that the mass matrices were not being correctly reproduced in SPheno. I later connected this with the definition of nuR, I had to define it with an additional conj:

Code: Select all

SuperFields[[8]] = {v, 3, conj[vR], 0, 1,  1, RpM};
Out of curiosity, I checked if this had any impact on the original version, where the nuR decouple. I found that the only modification was to the RGEs. I guess this probably has a negligible effect on phenomenology (unless CPV is important, maybe?), but anyway, thought you'd like to know.

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: Conj in Seesaw1

Post by FStaub » 20. Dec 2016, 12:16

Hi Joel,

thank you for the information. I'll take a look.

Cheers,
Florian

Post Reply