A Strange DEFINITION

Question how to implement a model or how to change a model implementation
Post Reply
lichuang
Posts: 10
Joined: 27. Nov 2016, 09:10

A Strange DEFINITION

Post by lichuang » 4. May 2017, 07:34

Dear Florian,

I have a puzzling problem. I find in some model files, there are definitions like the following definition codes:

DEFINITION[EWSB][GaugeES]={
Fd1 ->{ FdL, 0},
Fd2 ->{ 0, FdR},
Fu1 ->{ Fu1, 0},
Fu2 ->{ 0, Fu2},
Fe1 ->{ Fe1, 0},
Fe2 ->{ 0, Fe2}
};
What's the meaning of [EWSB][GaugeES]?
I guess it is just a typo and it is same with the following definition codes:

DEFINITION[GaugeES][DiracSpinors]={
Fd1 ->{ FdL, 0},
Fd2 ->{ 0, FdR},
Fu1 ->{ Fu1, 0},
Fu2 ->{ 0, Fu2},
Fe1 ->{ Fe1, 0},
Fe2 ->{ 0, Fe2}
};

Am I right?

If I am right, why when starting up the model, there is no warning or error information?

Best wishes!

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: A Strange DEFINITION

Post by FStaub » 4. May 2017, 09:37

Yes, that's a typo. However, the DiracSpinors for gauge eigenstates are usually not used, so this doesn't cause any problem.

Cheers,
Florian

lichuang
Posts: 10
Joined: 27. Nov 2016, 09:10

Re: A Strange DEFINITION

Post by lichuang » 4. May 2017, 10:02

Oh, I get it.
Thanks!

Post Reply