Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Hi Florian:
I want to construct a Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM In Gravity Mediation. I introduced three free parameters of the UV input. And the Soft SUSY Parameters From Gravity Mediation at GUT scale just depend on these three free parameters. I want to get the spheno code of this scenario. i just add these three parameters on MINPAR block in SPheno.m file like follows.
MINPAR={
{1,m0},
{2,m12},
{3,TanBeta},
{5,Azero},
{6,F24M},
{7,v24M},
{8,TM}
};
Then i get the spheno code . For runing spheno code , i add Block MSD2IN, MSE2IN, MSL2IN, MSQ2IN, MSU2IN, TDIN, TEIN, TUIN, MSOFTIN, NMSSMRUNIN in LesHouches.in.NMSSM file .
So Do I need to change more places in SPheno.m file and the generated fortran source code ?
I want to construct a Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM In Gravity Mediation. I introduced three free parameters of the UV input. And the Soft SUSY Parameters From Gravity Mediation at GUT scale just depend on these three free parameters. I want to get the spheno code of this scenario. i just add these three parameters on MINPAR block in SPheno.m file like follows.
MINPAR={
{1,m0},
{2,m12},
{3,TanBeta},
{5,Azero},
{6,F24M},
{7,v24M},
{8,TM}
};
Then i get the spheno code . For runing spheno code , i add Block MSD2IN, MSE2IN, MSL2IN, MSQ2IN, MSU2IN, TDIN, TEIN, TUIN, MSOFTIN, NMSSMRUNIN in LesHouches.in.NMSSM file .
So Do I need to change more places in SPheno.m file and the generated fortran source code ?
- Attachments
-
- LesHouches.in.NMSSM.txt
- (5.99 KiB) Downloaded 179 times
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Hi,
sorry, it's not exactly clear to me what you want to do:
why do you add the new parameters in MINPAR without using them in the boundary conditions afterwards?
Cheers,
Florian
sorry, it's not exactly clear to me what you want to do:
why do you add the new parameters in MINPAR without using them in the boundary conditions afterwards?
Cheers,
Florian
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Dear Florian:
I scan the new parameters' space , and the boundary conditions are the output value.
I scan the new parameters' space , and the boundary conditions are the output value.
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Sorry, it's still not clear to me what you want to do. Do use the new parameters somewhere else in SPheno.m?
Anyways, if the code runs for you and the results as expected, then go ahead. Otherwise, please be more specific with your question.
Cheers,
Florian
Anyways, if the code runs for you and the results as expected, then go ahead. Otherwise, please be more specific with your question.
Cheers,
Florian
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Dear Florian:
Thank you very much for your quick reply.
I'm terribly sorry 。 I didn't make the problem clear.
When i run the code , i can't generate right spectrum file.
Some warning always in Messages.out like follows:
Problem in rkqs, stepsize underflow
ErrorLevel, Iname: -1 1
The error has occured in the following chain of subroutines:
FirstGuess
runRGE
odeint
rkqs
rge218
ParametersToG218
I wonder if spheno can’t recognize the boundary conditions blocks that I added manually in LesHouches.in.NMSSM file ?
Thank you very much for your quick reply.
I'm terribly sorry 。 I didn't make the problem clear.
When i run the code , i can't generate right spectrum file.
Some warning always in Messages.out like follows:
Problem in rkqs, stepsize underflow
ErrorLevel, Iname: -1 1
The error has occured in the following chain of subroutines:
FirstGuess
runRGE
odeint
rkqs
rge218
ParametersToG218
I wonder if spheno can’t recognize the boundary conditions blocks that I added manually in LesHouches.in.NMSSM file ?
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Looking at your input, there are many issues:
1) TanBeta=0 doesn't because the leads to an Yukwas coupling which is infinity
2) lambda and kappa a very large; if you set them at the low scale, they run for sure in an Landau pole
3) mu=0 doesn't work either because it gives a massless chargino
...
Since all of this is are physical problems, we should stop the discussion here. The forum is supposed to give only support to technical problems. Everything else goes well beyond would I could provide...
1) TanBeta=0 doesn't because the leads to an Yukwas coupling which is infinity
2) lambda and kappa a very large; if you set them at the low scale, they run for sure in an Landau pole
3) mu=0 doesn't work either because it gives a massless chargino
...
Since all of this is are physical problems, we should stop the discussion here. The forum is supposed to give only support to technical problems. Everything else goes well beyond would I could provide...
Re: Non-Universal Gaugino Masses NMSSM
Dear Florian:
Thank you very much。
Thank you very much。