Two different results with the same SARAH/SPheno

[samyahaghi]

Hi Florian,

I tried to reproduce Mass Spectrum for 'Scotogenic Model' based on arXiv:1507.06349.

I used the SARAH 4.11.0 and SPheno 4.0.2 as the author used, but I got a little different results as follows:
################################################################################
Block MASS # Mass spectrum
# PDG code mass particle
25 1.27843218E+02 # hh >>>> Author >>> 1.25548349 E +02 # hh
1001 4.30116263E+02 # etR
1002 4.30116263E+02 # etI
1003 4.48012586E+02 # etp >>>> Author >>> 4.47388134 E +02 # etp
23 9.11887000E+01 # VZ
24 7.92544169E+01 # VWp >>>> Author >>> 8.03497269 E +01 # VWp
1 5.00000000E-03 # Fd_1
3 9.50000000E-02 # Fd_2
5 4.18000000E+00 # Fd_3
2 2.50000000E-03 # Fu_1
4 1.27000000E+00 # Fu_2
6 1.73500000E+02 # Fu_3
11 5.10998930E-04 # Fe_1
13 1.05658372E-01 # Fe_2
15 1.77669000E+00 # Fe_3
12 -9.04451554E-13 # Fv_1
14 -1.00553015E-11 # Fv_2
16 -4.81551646E-11 # Fv_3
1012 -3.45000000E+02 # Chi_1
1014 -4.80000000E+03 # Chi_2
1016 -6.80000000E+03 # Chi_3
################################################################################

May you help me to know why there are some differences?


Best,
Sam

[FStaub]

Hi,

The differences come most likely from different settings or SM input parameters. I don't see how I can help to resolve that. You should contact the authors and ask if they can provide the input filev they used.

Cheers
Florian

[Avelino]

Hi!
I will send you my input file, Sam. I hope that fixes the differences.

[samyahaghi]

Hi,

Thank you very much.

Cheers,
Sam