Weinberg-Operator in a Non-SUSY model
Posted: 11. Jun 2018, 10:28
Hi,
I'm well aware that SARAH does not support effective Operators in general, since it is a tool, which is used for beyond-tree-level calculations.
The wiki mentions that (http://stauby.de/sarah_wiki/index.php?t ... rpotential) one can add e.g the Weinberg-operator to the superpotential of a given model. This is implemented e.g in the model "Seesaw 1", that comes with the package.
Since I need the Weinberg-operator for a non-supersymmetric theory purely at tree level, I wondered if one could also add this operator to a Lagrangian in SARAH.
I took the "Seesaw 1" model and rewrote everything in terms of non-SUSY conventions (e.g fermions and scalars instead of supermultiplets, lagrangian instead of superpotential etc.) and the Weinberg-operator does not appear in the neutrino mass matrix, whereas the rest of the model works fine.
Are higher dimensional operators only supported for SUSY theories and if yes is there a work-around to use them for non-SUSY theories?
Any help or comment would be greatly appreciated
Max
I'm well aware that SARAH does not support effective Operators in general, since it is a tool, which is used for beyond-tree-level calculations.
The wiki mentions that (http://stauby.de/sarah_wiki/index.php?t ... rpotential) one can add e.g the Weinberg-operator to the superpotential of a given model. This is implemented e.g in the model "Seesaw 1", that comes with the package.
Since I need the Weinberg-operator for a non-supersymmetric theory purely at tree level, I wondered if one could also add this operator to a Lagrangian in SARAH.
I took the "Seesaw 1" model and rewrote everything in terms of non-SUSY conventions (e.g fermions and scalars instead of supermultiplets, lagrangian instead of superpotential etc.) and the Weinberg-operator does not appear in the neutrino mass matrix, whereas the rest of the model works fine.
Are higher dimensional operators only supported for SUSY theories and if yes is there a work-around to use them for non-SUSY theories?
Any help or comment would be greatly appreciated
Max