Page 1 of 1
Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 8. Dec 2017, 05:32
by Amin
Hi Florian,
I was wondering if implementing a U(1)_L(e)-L(mu) gauge symmetry extension of the SM is easy in SARAH. Also, can one add a non-chiral fermion field?
Thank you,
Amin
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 8. Dec 2017, 07:36
by Amin
For the non-chiral fermion case, I was thinking of writing something as:
Code: Select all
FermionFields[[1]] = {XL, 1, xL, 0, 1, 1, -1};
FermionFields[[2]] = {XR, 1, conj[xR], 0, 1, 1, -1};
and
Code: Select all
DEFINITION[EWSB][DiracSpinors]={
FX ->{ xL, xR} }
Does SARAH understand this as a non-chiral field?
Best,
Amin
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 8. Dec 2017, 09:38
by FStaub
Yes, that should work.
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 8. Dec 2017, 12:25
by Amin
Thanks Florian.
What about implementing a U(1) L(e)-L(mu) extension to the SM? Is it doable with SARAH?
Best,
Amin
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 9. Dec 2017, 05:41
by Amin
Hi again,
To implement the U(1) e-mu model, the tau field must be uncharged under the new U(1). So I can define the e, mu and tau fermion fields separately which can be done in SARAH, apparently. Would something like this work?
Code: Select all
FermionFields[[1]]={l, 2, {vL0, eL0}, -1/2,2,1,1}
FermionFields[[2]]={lt, 1, {tvL0, tlL0}, -1/2,2,1,0}
DEFINITION[EWSB][Flavors]= {
{FvL0, {FveL,FvmL}},
{FeL0, {FeL, FmL}},
{FtvL0, {FvtL}},
{FtlL0, {FtauL}}
}
I have kept the tau but gave it zero charge under U(1)_X in hopes that SPheno would work. Does that sound reasonable?
Thank you,
Amin
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 9. Dec 2017, 07:06
by FStaub
Yes, that's the way you need to do it.
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 9. Dec 2017, 17:23
by Amin
Thanks Florian.
I guess I also need to modify the Yukawa couplings accordingly.
Best,
Amin
Re: Gauged e-mu extension
Posted: 11. Dec 2017, 10:14
by FStaub
Yes, you must treat the fields in the entire model as different particles.