CCB model in SARAH

[jyotiranjan]

Dear Florian,

Will it affect Vevacious model file generation if I remove information about
mixing matrices from "parameter.m" and instead, define them "model.m" file
as per requirement as in CCB scenarios ?

Best regards,
Jyotiranjan

[jyotiranjan]

Dear Florian,

I am unable to generate Vevacious model file properly for CCB-MSSM (stop-vev)
case. I am using SARAH-4.9.3 with default setup with following commands.

<< "SARAH.m"
Start["CCB-MSSM", "StopVEVs"]
MakeVevacious[]

I am mentioning a part of the Vevacious model file generated.

0.03125*vdR^4*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
+ (-0.0625*vdR^2*vuR^2*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
+ (0.03125*vuR^4*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
+ (-0.010416666666666666*vdR^2*vuLr33*vuLr3[gen1]*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
+ (0.010416666666666666*vuLr33*vuR^2*vuLr3[gen1]*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
+ (-0.010416666666666666*vdR^2*vuLr33*vuLr3[gen3]*SLHA::GAUGE[1.]^2)
...

Regards,
Jyotiranjan

[FStaub]

Hi,

I would need to check where the problem comes from. I guess there is some incompatibility with changes in another interface which I did recently, because the Vevacious output wasn't touches for some time. Could you please try in the meantime version 4.9.0 for instancen.

Concerning the first question: it's not clear to me, how you will define information about mixing matrices in model.m. I guess this might be dangerous, because SARAH applies these definitions only at specific places while at others the matrix name must appear as Symbol not Array.

Cheers,
Florian

[jyotiranjan]

Dear Florian,

Thanks a lot for your reply. I checked with older versions of SARAH and
it works.

Could you mention roughly at what stage "parameter.m" and "particles.m"
are used. Are the field names and parameters extracted from superpotential
and soft breaking terms or they are loaded from these files ?

Best regards,
Jyotiranjan

[FStaub]

Hi,

details about parameters.m and particles.m are given here: http://stauby.de/sarah_wiki/index.php?t ... mentations

Cheers
Florian

[jyotiranjan]

Thanks a lot, Florian.