Hi Florian,

I am wondering how exactly SARAH is interpreting conj[...] when writing non-supersymmetric model files. It is not clear to me if this is hermitian or charge conjugation, and I have seen contradictory examples. Furthermore, even if it was clear which operation is implied by conj[] , the question how the other one is handled is still open.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,

conj[...] is the superposition: SARAH interprets it in a way that a Lagrangian term becomes Lorentz and gauge invariance.

Cheers,
Florian