Meaning of conj[..]

Question how to implement a model or how to change a model implementation
Post Reply
MailQuestion
Posts: 12
Joined: 11. Oct 2016, 09:37

Meaning of conj[..]

Post by MailQuestion » 10. Nov 2016, 21:20

Hi Florian,

I am wondering how exactly SARAH is interpreting conj[...] when writing non-supersymmetric model files. It is not clear to me if this is hermitian or charge conjugation, and I have seen contradictory examples. Furthermore, even if it was clear which operation is implied by conj[] , the question how the other one is handled is still open.
Thanks in advance.

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: Meaning of conj[..]

Post by FStaub » 10. Nov 2016, 21:24

Hi,

conj[...] is the superposition: SARAH interprets it in a way that a Lagrangian term becomes Lorentz and gauge invariance.

Cheers,
Florian

Post Reply