Problem with SSP - plotting and No valid parameters found in SSP scan

[FStaub]

Hi,

you say that MicrOmega reads SPheno.spc.UMSSM_low? Then the problem is that it just ignores the SPheno.spc.UMSSM which SSP copies to the directoyr and used instead always the SPheno.spc.UMSSM_low. You can check (and modify) work/model/func1.mdl what spc file is used.

Cheers,
Florian

[felipeagf]

Ok Florian. Now that I modified the file func1.mdl SSP seems to be working correctly now writing the correct Dark Matter predictions of each point, but there are still appearing in the Terminal the warning same messages

rm: cannot remove '/afs/atlass01.physik.uni-bonn.de/user/felipeag/Computerprograms2/SSP-1.2.3/Output/ScanvS/SpectrumFiles.spc': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove 'omg.out': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove 'omg.out': No such file or directory
rm: cannot remove 'omg.out': No such file or directory



Thank you very much!!!



Cheers
Felipe

[felipeagf]

Hi Florian

I would like to know if it is possible to use the "CheckSavingPoints" function more than once in a Scatter scan using SSP. This function worked in cases where I imposed one constraint like Higgs Mass between 122 and 128 GeV, but it did not work when I added other set of points to be saved.

I wrote in my input file the following commands to save points where simultaneously the Z' mass is above 3700 GeV and the Higgs mass is between 122 and 125 GeV

DEFINITION[a_][UseCheckSavingPoints]=True;
DEFINITION[a_][CheckSavingPoints][spc_]:=If[(MASS[31]/.spc)>3700,True,False];
DEFINITION[a_][CheckSavingPoints][spc_]:=If[128>(MASS[25]/.spc)>122,True,False];

but in the spectrumfiles.spc output there appeared only points in agreement with the second imposition (128>mH>122) and not with the first one. Is there a way to use the "CheckSavingPoints" function of SSP in such a way that it can follow more than one constraint?




Cheers
Felipe

[FStaub]

Each definition of CheckSavingPoints overwrites the previous one. So, you need to combine all conditions in a single function.

Cheers
Florian

[felipeagf]

Thanks!!!!


Cheers
Felipe

[MAMC]

Which mathemetica version we have to install here. i am also facing similar problem. if it is possible can you send me the Sample of plotting file. I will be thankful to you

Regards,
Atif

[MAMC]

Is there any one can tell about which version of Mathemetica is good for ploting graphe. where we can change x nd y label according to requirements

[FStaub]

If you want to use the psfrag functionality of SSP, you need a rather old one. (8 or 9 at most). Therefore, this is no longer supported.
However, Mathematica also got much better in the recent versions in this direction. One can now get decent labels without making use of LaTeX.

Cheers,
Florian

[MAMC]

thanx Florian

cheers
atif