Compilation of SPhenoMSSMTriLnV fails

Report the bugs you found
Post Reply
Bjorn
Posts: 2
Joined: 11. Jun 2017, 12:55

Compilation of SPhenoMSSMTriLnV fails

Post by Bjorn » 11. Jun 2017, 14:38

...using

- SARAH 4.11.0
- SPheno 4.0.3
- gfortran from gcc 5.4.0
- Mathematica 11.0.1

with the following error
/opt/local/bin/gfortran-mp-5 -c -g -ffree-line-length-none -J../include -I../include LoopDecays/Wrapper_LoopDecay_Sd_MSSMTriLnV.f90
LoopDecays/Wrapper_LoopDecay_Sd_MSSMTriLnV.f90:1452:69:

AmpWaveZSdToFvFd(1,:,gt2,:) = AmpWaveZSdToFvFd(1,:,gt2,:)+ZRUNoMatrix(gt2,gt1)*AmpWaveSdToFvFd(1,:,gt1,:)
1
Error: Function 'zrunomatrix' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
LoopDecays/Wrapper_LoopDecay_Sd_MSSMTriLnV.f90:1453:72:

AmpVertexZSdToFvFd(1,:,gt2,:)= AmpVertexZSdToFvFd(1,:,gt2,:)+ZRUNoMatrix(gt2,gt1)*AmpVertexSdToFvFd(1,:,gt1,:)
1
Error: Function 'zrunomatrix' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
LoopDecays/Wrapper_LoopDecay_Sd_MSSMTriLnV.f90:1454:70:

AmpWaveZSdToFvFd(2,:,gt2,:) = AmpWaveZSdToFvFd(2,:,gt2,:)+ZRUNoMatrixc(gt2,gt1)*AmpWaveSdToFvFd(2,:,gt1,:)
1
Error: Function 'zrunomatrixc' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
LoopDecays/Wrapper_LoopDecay_Sd_MSSMTriLnV.f90:1455:73:

AmpVertexZSdToFvFd(2,:,gt2,:)= AmpVertexZSdToFvFd(2,:,gt2,:)+ZRUNoMatrixc(gt2,gt1)*AmpVertexSdToFvFd(2,:,gt1,:)
1
Error: Function 'zrunomatrixc' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type

FStaub
Site Admin
Posts: 822
Joined: 13. Apr 2016, 14:05

Re: Compilation of SPhenoMSSMTriLnV fails

Post by FStaub » 12. Jun 2017, 09:44

Hi,

the origin of the error message is the following:
in this model, the mixing between the neutrino/neutralinos is neglected which gets loop-induced if you turn on the LLE or LQD operator. This causes inconsistencies in the wave-function contributions to the loop decays. So, there are two possibilities:
  • 1) If you are interested in the main (collider) effects of trilinear RpV, but you don't need necessarily the loop corrections to the two-body decys, use

    Code: Select all

    MakeSPheno[IncludeLoopDecays->False]
    
    2) If you don't bother to have a more complicated model with all the mixing between SM and MSSM fields included, use the model MSSM-RpV/LnV
Cheers
Florian

Post Reply