Dear Florian,
How could I set options of MakeCHep[options] in SARAH to generate calchep/micromegas model files that could support slha1 format?
Thank you,
Liang
Search found 11 matches
- 23. Mar 2019, 03:29
- Forum: CalcHep/CompHep, MicrOmegas
- Topic: SARAH generate calchep/micromegas model files supporting slha1 format
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14795
- 13. Sep 2017, 11:01
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Typo in inverse-Seesaw-NMSSM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1753
Typo in inverse-Seesaw-NMSSM
Hi Florian, 1. There is the following stuff in the file SPheno.m in the model inverse-Seesaw-NMSSM in SARAH-4.12.2, BoundaryLowScaleInput={ {vd,Sqrt[4 mz2/(g1^2+g2^2)]*Sin[ArcTan[TanBeta]]}, {vu,Sqrt[4 mz2/(g1^2+g2^2)]*Cos[ArcTan[TanBeta]]} }; but it should be, BoundaryLowScaleInput={ {vd,Sqrt[4 mz2...
- 23. Jul 2016, 17:03
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
- Replies: 6
- Views: 64298
Re: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
Dear Ben,
Thank you for your reply. I understand.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
Thank you for your reply. I understand.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
- 23. Jul 2016, 04:17
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
- Replies: 6
- Views: 64298
Re: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
Dear Ben,
Thank you for your reply. I want to know if it is reasonable to calculate the tunneling action at T=0 and ignore the non-zero temperature effect. Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
Thank you for your reply. I want to know if it is reasonable to calculate the tunneling action at T=0 and ignore the non-zero temperature effect. Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
- 22. Jul 2016, 16:07
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
- Replies: 6
- Views: 64298
Re: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
Dear Ben, Thank you for your reply. I did as your suggestion. And I got the following result successfully. But I am not sure I could use this result because of the warning message, which indicates that our parameter point is long-lived. What’s more, could I ignore this warning message? Best wishes a...
- 21. Jul 2016, 17:57
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
- Replies: 6
- Views: 64298
Error: Failed to retrieve initial conditions on the first try
Dear Florian, I have used the Spheno to generate the spectrum for Vevacious in the NMSSM. But I still got some error as the followings: File "./CosmoTransitions-master/cosmoTransitions/pathDeformation.py", line 957, in fullTunneling profile1D = tobj.findProfile(**tunneling_findProfile_params) File "...
- 2. Jul 2016, 05:23
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 48223
Re: Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
Dear Florian,
Thank you for your reply. And I will try as your suggestion.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
Thank you for your reply. And I will try as your suggestion.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
- 30. Jun 2016, 17:58
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 48223
Re: Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
Dear Eliel,
Thank you for your reply.
But I have one more question. What’s the inputting parameters for the potential you choose. Is it M_su^2, M_sq^2, etc. or others? In our work, we scan for tan\beta, so vu and vd are inputting parameters for the potential.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
Thank you for your reply.
But I have one more question. What’s the inputting parameters for the potential you choose. Is it M_su^2, M_sq^2, etc. or others? In our work, we scan for tan\beta, so vu and vd are inputting parameters for the potential.
Best wishes and regards,
Liang
- 30. Jun 2016, 07:46
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 48223
Error messages of 'Barrier height is not positive’ and ‘V(phi_metaMin) <= V(phi_absMin)’ in Vevacious-1.2.1
Dear, When we use the model file pure_SLHA2_NMSSM_JustNormalHiggsAndSingletVevs.vin to calculate the stability of the parameter point named spectr12.dat which is in the attachment. We find the error message (labeled as E1): tunneling1D.PotentialError: ('Barrier height is not positive, does not exist...
- 29. Jun 2016, 19:38
- Forum: Vevacious
- Topic: There is a typo in the model file in the Vevacious-1.2.1 and some other questions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 37088
Re: There is a typo in the model file in the Vevacious-1.2.1 and some other questions
Dear Eliel, Thank you. I followed your suggestions but I could not get the desired result. I got the following errors, tunneling1D.PotentialError: ('Barrier height is not positive, does not exist.', 'no barrier') Minimizing the one-loop potential, calculating the tunneling time or its upper bound, a...