Hi Florian,
thanks a lot -- this makes it clear to me!
Cheers,
Björn

Hi Florian, thanks for your reply! (it is good to see that you still read and post here!) In the above example, indeed I did not conjugate the scalar, but in fact this changes nothing. Asking for the vertex saying P0 or conj[P0] is exactly the same: In[11]:= Vertex[{bar[Fe], FXc, conj[P0]}] Out[11]=...

Dear all, we are currently implementing a non-supersymmetric model including, in addition to the Standard Model, a couple of scalars and new fermions. One important feature of this model is that neutrino masses are generated radiatively at the one-loop level. In a simple case, it turns out that only...

Dear all, we are currently implementing a non-supersymmetric model including, in addition to the Standard Model, a couple of scalars and new fermions. One important feature of this model is that neutrino masses are generated radiatively at the one-loop level. In a simple case, it turns out that only...

Hello, in our institute, we have just switched to Mathematica 12, and since then (at least I did not notice it before), I get the following two warnings when loading SARAH: << "[...]/SARAH.m" Remove::rmptc: Symbol JLink`Fields is Protected and cannot be removed. dims::shdw: Symbol dims appears in mu...

Yes, indeed I have included the mixing although physically speaking there is no mixing, since only one generation. However, the code seemed to complain when I did not include this "mixing". Concerning the neutrino, no direct mass term, neutrino mass generation proceeds on one-loop level through coup...

Hola Avelino, I also get such warning, but I checked in my case as well, and I believe that this is not a problem (and not related to the issues I experience). Thanks for sending the scotogenic model, I will try tomorrow, and report here what the outcome is regarding my implementation. Thanks a lot,...

Hi all, I am still confused about this double declaration issue. The fermion mass, now called MX, is still declared twice... I attach once more my now up-to-date model files. The problems I get now are as follows: 1) I get some errors when running MakeSPheno[]: Write I/O routines Writing input routi...

OK, thanks to this information. Does this mean I should change the Output name, like {Mchi, {Real -> True, LaTeX -> "M_{\\chi}", LesHouches -> MChi, OutputName-> MChiXY }}, or sth in that style ? I am a bit confused about SPheno will then make the identification with the parameter given in the Lagra...

Hi Florian, I agree that it must have to do with the double declaration of e.g. Mchi, but also other parameters. I just went through my model files and I only use MChi (in this precise spelling) in the model files. It seemed to be declared once as complex, and then once as real... Any idea about wha...