Dear Florian, I got a question regarding definition of a complex phase. Suppose that one introduces a phase through the following function: DEFINITION[GaugeES][Phases]= { {Hp, Exp[I eta]}, {H0, Exp[I eta]} }; For simplicity assume that we get the following rule: SA`VertexList[SSSS] = {{{hh[{gt1}], h...

Dear Florian, I got a question regardless of MatrixProduct function. As an example, let us consider a provided THDM model. For W+- you get: Vertex[{bar[Fd], Fu, VWm}] {{-((I g2 Delta[ct1, ct2] sum[j1, 1, 3, conj[Vu[gt2, j1]] Vd[gt1, j1]])/Sqrt[2]), LorentzProduct[gamma[lt3], PL]}, {0, PR}} You can s...

Dear Florian, First of all, I decided to get rid of all DependenceNum-> for the scalar potential so that the mass eigenvalues would be expressed in terms of couplings; talking about the code provided above. It did not help. I am not sure about the second comment. I got: DEFINITION[GaugeES][Phases]= ...

Dear Florian, First of all, I tried re-ordering scalar states so that the Goldstone boson would appear first. Unfortunately this did not work. I checked vertices and those are in agreement with previous results. Also, just to be sure, I changed the Goldstone field in the Z section. In CalcHEP I was ...

Dear Florian, First of all, sorry for a messy question but I believe that you can shed light on the problem. As I am a new user to SARAH, this is hopefully something trivial. I am working with an extend SM Higgs sector, more specifically 3HDM where one of the doublets is inert. The main purpose of u...