Hi Florian, Thanks !! I have been able to create the spheno version and compile it. I have a general question about the spheno version created by SARAH in general. Does spheno check whether the EW minimum it computes is a global one (ie they are other minimum with trivial vevs that could be global o...

Hi, Thanks !! Hopefully the final one: I get compilation errors because dSinTW, -dCosTW are not defined in OneLoopDecays_Anomalyfree.f90 But they are defined in spheno.m RenConditionsDecays={ {dCosTW, 1/2*Cos[ThetaW] * (PiVWm/(MVWm^2) - PiVZ/(mVZ^2)) }, {dSinTW, -dCosTW/Tan[ThetaW]}, {dg2, 1/2*g2*(d...

Hi Florian, Many thanks for this !! I have installed mathematica 11 and all the issues I had before have gone, including the problems with the 1-loop decays. Now I'm trying to compile the resulting spheno but I get some problems: TwoLoopMasses/2LPole_Anomalyfree.f90(184): error #6404: This name does...

Hi Florian, I have realized that the implementation of the Chi and Psi fields is not correct since I want Dirac fields not Majorana and don't know how to do it. I have tried several things but no one works !!! For Psi I have tried in the Mattersector: {{{psiLc,etaL}, {psiRc,etaR}}, {{Lm,RCm}, {Lp,RC...

Hi, Ok, thanks for the advise. In any case the changes don't solve the issue with charge violation. I have checked that when I apply AntiField to the Psi field it does not change. That is the problem since I have vertex like: Psi Psi Ah or Psi Psi VZ. One of the Psi shall be bar(Psi) I really don't ...

Hi Florian, I have been investigating the charge violation issue and I have two questions: 1. I have defined: FermionFields[[10]] = {psiL, 1, {psiLn,psiLc}, -1/2, 2, 1,-3/2}; FermionFields[[11]] = {psiR, 1, {conj[psiRc],conj[psiRn]}, 1/2, 2, 1,-3/2}; ScalarFields[[2]] = {SB, 1, SB, 0, 1, 1, -3}; And...

Hi, I have tried with your proposal and the problems in the two-loop calculations have gone :) So now there a few remaining ones that I don't know I should worry about: 1. Vertex::ChargeViolating: Non-zero result for {PsiC,PsiC,VP} vertex which violates charge. (This might just be a problem with sim...

Hi,


I can confirm it, it's a mathematica problem since I have checked other already implemented models and all
give the same problem.


Rbt

Hi FLorian,


I have updated my version and the problem persists. I don't know what is going on.
Could be mathematica ?


Rbt

Hi,

1) I don't see errors in the two-loop calculations. Do you use the most recent version?

Strange, I'm using 4.12.3 and mathematica 10.0 !!

2) You have not defined the electric charge for all new states in particles.m

Ok. I'll add this and try again.


Best,
Rbt