Search found 14 matches
- 31. Dec 2020, 14:16
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Bug in FeynArts output
- Replies: 0
- Views: 20059
Bug in FeynArts output
Dear developers, I seem to have stumbled across a bug in FeynArts output. In feynarts.m there is a line setting the gauge parameter for Goldstone bosons: WriteString[outputfile,"GaugeXi[S["<>ToString[FeynArtsNr[PART[S][[i,1]]]]<>",1]] = GaugeXi["<>ToString[Select[GoldstoneBosons[InitalizedVertexCalc...
- 14. May 2018, 13:15
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Input vs. Output at tree level
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4175
Re: Input vs. Output at tree level
Sorry for the misunderstanding and thank you for pointing in the right direction! Turns out, that I had introduced typos in the block SMINPUTS, when making a scanning package...now it all matches nicely. Thanks again!
Regards,
Simonas
Regards,
Simonas
- 14. May 2018, 09:15
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Input vs. Output at tree level
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4175
Re: Input vs. Output at tree level
I have attached the model and thank you for having a look.
Regards,
Simonas
Regards,
Simonas
- 11. May 2018, 16:43
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Input vs. Output at tree level
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4175
Re: Input vs. Output at tree level
Hello,
I have downloaded the new version and included the new 19th flag but the deviation remains.
Maybe you could specify the special combination of flags so that I can try it out?
Regards,
Simonas
I have downloaded the new version and included the new 19th flag but the deviation remains.
Maybe you could specify the special combination of flags so that I can try it out?
Regards,
Simonas
- 9. May 2018, 14:24
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Input vs. Output at tree level
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4175
Input vs. Output at tree level
Hello, I have a question about comparing the input vs. output at tree level. What I have tried looking at is essentially the potential of the two Higgs doublet model in the Higgs basis. I do have some of the tree level expressions relating physical quantities to the input parameters at tree level. I...
- 21. Apr 2018, 19:54
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Complex neutrino Yukawa
- Replies: 28
- Views: 25733
Re: Complex neutrino Yukawa
Dear Florian, I did some more digging and in their code documentation they reference this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.01.170 , which I could not access for free. I think that by using Takagi's factorization they are able to bypass actually having M^{Dagger}M, but they do get square roo...
- 19. Apr 2018, 19:57
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Complex neutrino Yukawa
- Replies: 28
- Views: 25733
Re: Complex neutrino Yukawa
Dear Florian, so in essence, the minimal mass of neutrinos in the complex case is limited by 10^(-30)*MR^2 instead of 10^(-30)*MR? I took a little peek at the code in FlexibleSUSY. As far as I can tell, it does not try to deal with asymmetric matrices. Specifically, only the upper triangle of the Mv...
- 18. Apr 2018, 22:52
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Complex neutrino Yukawa
- Replies: 28
- Views: 25733
Re: Complex neutrino Yukawa
Dear Florian, thank you for the fixes and looking into it! Though, I am still bumping into problems. I did replace the MathematicsQP.f90 file, the lines in TreeMasses_MODEL and recompiled everything. I no longer get NaNs, but with purely imaginary Yukawa I get this error: Calculating mass spectrum 1...
- 17. Apr 2018, 22:22
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Complex neutrino Yukawa
- Replies: 28
- Views: 25733
Re: Complex neutrino Yukawa
Thanks, it's nice to have a confirmation! However, I now return to problems of having complex neutrino Yukawa couplings...I am trying to implement a model with two Higgs doublets and heavy Majorana neutrino. I have attached the model files. I have edited the src/Makefile, recompiled SPheno and also ...
- 16. Apr 2018, 22:43
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Complex neutrino Yukawa
- Replies: 28
- Views: 25733
Re: Complex neutrino Yukawa
Dear Florian, I'll join in on questioning about QP precision. In the wiki it is said, that one needs to enable QP precision in the model file and I can't seem to find that statement anywhere else. Is it enough to delete the -DONLYDOUBLE flag and recompile, or should one also use, for example, Quadru...