Hi,
Starting with "BoundaryLowScaleInput", is it possible for SPheno to calculate the running couplings to high scale?
Does SPheno use only top-down approach?
Cheers,
Sam
Search found 30 matches
- 7. Feb 2022, 12:05
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Running couplings from low to high scale
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14929
- 11. Oct 2019, 14:11
- Forum: SPheno
- Topic: Problem with downloading SPheno 4.0.4
- Replies: 3
- Views: 71725
Re: Problem with downloading SPheno 4.0.4
I also tested it by "remote URL upload" websites, but the result was the same.
Please, may you send it to me?
sam.yahaghi@gmail.com
Best,
Sam
Please, may you send it to me?
sam.yahaghi@gmail.com
Best,
Sam
- 5. Oct 2019, 12:54
- Forum: SPheno
- Topic: Problem with downloading SPheno 4.0.4
- Replies: 3
- Views: 71725
Problem with downloading SPheno 4.0.4
Hi,
SPheno 4.0.4 has downloading problem.
Please check it out.
Cheers,
Sam
SPheno 4.0.4 has downloading problem.
Please check it out.
Cheers,
Sam
- 10. Sep 2019, 13:08
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: SARAH 4.14.2 & SPheno for THDM Model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 36130
Re: SARAH 4.14.2 & SPheno for THDM Model
Also MicrOmegas 5 gives the following error:
rm -f tmp/safe
../../CalcHEP_src/bin/s_calchep -blind "{[[{[[[[[[{}0"
ERROR:Error in table 'Parameters ' line 1 field 'Value' position 0:
wrong number 'Null'
Makefile:18: recipe for target 'VandP.c' failed
make[1]: *** [VandP.c] Error 125
rm -f tmp/safe
../../CalcHEP_src/bin/s_calchep -blind "{[[{[[[[[[{}0"
ERROR:Error in table 'Parameters ' line 1 field 'Value' position 0:
wrong number 'Null'
Makefile:18: recipe for target 'VandP.c' failed
make[1]: *** [VandP.c] Error 125
- 10. Sep 2019, 12:37
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: SARAH 4.14.2 & SPheno for THDM Model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 36130
SARAH 4.14.2 & SPheno for THDM Model
Hi, Compiling SPheno for THDM model created by SARAH 4.14.2 leads to the following error: gfortran -c -g -ffree-line-length-none -J../include -I../include InputOutput_THDM.f90 InputOutput_THDM.f90:4840:42: Write(io_L,200) INT(Abs(PDGVG)),1._dp*Null, "VG" 1 Error: Symbol ‘null’ at (1) has no IMPLICIT...
- 14. Jan 2019, 22:45
- Forum: SSP
- Topic: How SSP reads Vevacious block
- Replies: 1
- Views: 30835
How SSP reads Vevacious block
Hi, May I know how SSP reads Vevacious block (I mean its shape)? Is the following correct as a restriction? DEFINITION[a_][CheckSavingPoints][spc_]:=If[(VEVACIOUSRESULTS["block number","block number"]/.spc) < "a number" ,True,False]; Will you provide me an example SSP scan with some restriction on V...
- 8. Dec 2018, 20:51
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Trace & SARAH
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3348
Re: Trace & SARAH
Hi,
To make sure that I am in right direction, after starting a model in SARAH, Is there a command to write the potential in terms of doublets and triplets components?
(Since I am new with contraction in SARAH, I want to check it with manual calculation.)
Best,
Sam
To make sure that I am in right direction, after starting a model in SARAH, Is there a command to write the potential in terms of doublets and triplets components?
(Since I am new with contraction in SARAH, I want to check it with manual calculation.)
Best,
Sam
- 8. Dec 2018, 11:56
- Forum: SSP
- Topic: More points in some ranges
- Replies: 1
- Views: 28868
More points in some ranges
Hi,
If I want to have more points in some ranges, what should I do?
For example:
In a linear scan from x=1..100 with steps=100, I want to have more points in the ranges x=30..40 and x=90..95 with steps=1000.
Regards,
Sam
If I want to have more points in some ranges, what should I do?
For example:
In a linear scan from x=1..100 with steps=100, I want to have more points in the ranges x=30..40 and x=90..95 with steps=1000.
Regards,
Sam
- 7. Dec 2018, 09:54
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Trace & SARAH
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3348
Trace & SARAH
Hi,
To have traces in a potential in SARAH, can we use trace[A,B,C,....]?
Best,
Sam
To have traces in a potential in SARAH, can we use trace[A,B,C,....]?
Best,
Sam
- 28. Jul 2018, 20:49
- Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
- Topic: Renormalisation Scale in Spheno
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1818
Renormalisation Scale in Spheno
Hi,
For many SM like models, Spheno shows Renormalisation Scale=160GeV.
May I ask how this scale 160GeV is achieved?
Is it just a fixed guess or dynamical?
Regards,
Sam
For many SM like models, Spheno shows Renormalisation Scale=160GeV.
May I ask how this scale 160GeV is achieved?
Is it just a fixed guess or dynamical?
Regards,
Sam