Search found 6 matches

by jgeilson
5. Apr 2018, 13:46
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorons
Replies: 8
Views: 4662

Re: Majorons

Yep in the Landau gauge every was working fine looking at the mass matrix generate by SARAH. I will try SARAH 4.10.2 because in this version another 331 version worked fine. 1) The pseudo-scalar sneutrinos will be the marjorons particles because the lepton number is spontaneous broken and we have us...
by jgeilson
5. Apr 2018, 02:35
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorons
Replies: 8
Views: 4662

Re: Majorons

No problem. I will send to your email because I will include the SPheno output.
Thanks a lot for your time.


Cheers,
Geilson
by jgeilson
4. Apr 2018, 01:34
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorons
Replies: 8
Views: 4662

Re: Majorons

This values are only tree level calculation and because this I am worried... If you want I can send you the model and the SPheno output (take some time here) or the LesHouches file with the compiled SPheno or both.

Cheers,
Geilson
by jgeilson
3. Apr 2018, 19:18
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorons
Replies: 8
Views: 4662

Re: Majorons

Sorry for the late replay.

For my surprise isn't that small. I was expected some mass O(10^-(4<->6)) but in general the result is a few GeV or negative ones. I already double check all the model to see if I was doing something wrong but I can't find nothing. :cry:



Cheers,
Geilson
by jgeilson
1. Apr 2018, 15:17
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorons
Replies: 8
Views: 4662

Majorons

Hi Florian, I am trying to study some inplications of a leptonic SSB. The model, due the leptonic SSB, have majorons particles and SPheno all the time calculate a mass to this particles (a small one and most of the time a negative mass). I was wondering if have a special way to implement this kind o...
by jgeilson
17. May 2017, 17:13
Forum: Output of SARAH
Topic: type II seesaw RGEs
Replies: 2
Views: 19460

type II seesaw RGEs

Hi Florian, I was trying to make the RGEs of the non-susy type II SeeSaw but when this three interactions lambda1 conj[trip].trip.conj[H].H + lambda4 conj[H].conj[trip].trip.H + lambda5 conj[H].trip.conj[trip].H are present I get this issue: RGEs::StillEntangled: Can't disentangle the contributions ...