Hi Florian,

ok thanks.

Still, it is a little bit confusing because in the parameters.m file located in
SARAH-4.12.3/Models directory, the definition of TanBeta also has

OutputName-> tb

Alternatively I also tried

OutputName-> tanbeta

and it compiles without errors.

Thanks a lot.

Hi Florian, I have a low energy model where 3 scalar doublets receive a vev but 2 of the vevs are proportional so effectively there are only 2 vevs, I checked the model with CheckModel[] and there seems not to be an apparent error. I'm interested in calculating the relic density of an additional ine...

Hi Florian, I was trying to trace an error in a model I'm implementing and I notice in the source file SPhenoBoundaryEW.m that this line: WriteString[sphenoSugra,"vev2=mZ2_Q*CosW2SinW2/(pi*alphaQ) -"<>SPhenoForm[SA`AdditionalDoubletVEVs]<>" \n"]; translates in the Fortran code wrongly in the case th...

On the other hand, doesn't SARAH solves for TanBeta from the matching conditions?

But then why it gives the NAN error when I dont write the initial value of TanBeta in the
LH input file?

Would you clarify a little on this?

Thank you for your time.

Edit:

For some reason the input file is missing the line

10 5.0000000E+01 # TanBeta

when I put it by hand then it works without any error.

Cheers.

Hi Florian, Thank you for your time, one more question. After successful compilation of SPheno module for this model (THDMIII) I use the input file generated by SARAH for low energy (as it is without modification) and get a NAN error: ./bin/SPhenoTHDMIII ./LesHouches.in.THDMIII_low NaN appearing in ...

Hi

It's working now,

Thanks a lot.

Hi Florian I think there are also problems when trying to compile the Spheno modules with latest ifort for the THDM-III that comes with SARAH. I generated the Spheno output and tried to compile it. It stops after many errors, e.g. see below. On the other hand, I successfully compiled the modules for...

Hi Yes, for the example from micromegas it also fails to compile main.cpp with similar errors. So the problem seems to be gcc's bad backward compatibility. I don't know of other linux distributions, but for those using fedora if you're thinking of upgrading to a new release, your compiler will proba...

Update: I thought that maybe I have a problem with the compiler which was installed from the fedora repository, so I tried upgrading to gcc v7.1 bypassing the repository and building directly from the gcc source code. Unfortunately with this update of gcc I get the same errors when trying to compile...