Search found 822 matches

by FStaub
25. Feb 2020, 20:11
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Question concerning scalar mixing
Replies: 4
Views: 5635

Re: Question concerning scalar mixing

Hi Björn, 1) since P0 is real, you get the same for conj[P0] and P0 as it should be 2) the rotation is defined in a way that you have P0_i = Z_ij^* S_j for some gauge eingestate S 3) SARAH doesn't know by its own that Z is real, i.e. it assumed that it is complex. In principle, there are two possibl...
by FStaub
9. Feb 2020, 20:09
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Question concerning scalar mixing
Replies: 4
Views: 5635

Re: Question concerning scalar mixing

Hi Björn,

You don't use conj[PO] in your conjugated vertex, ie I don't expect any change in the corresponding mixing matrix. The question is: is PO and the rotation matrix real in general?

Cheers
Florian
by FStaub
9. Feb 2020, 20:06
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Can one set Dependence to zero?
Replies: 1
Views: 3373

Re: Can one set Dependence to zero?

Hi,

I think not.
It's also dangerous: in general, you have this triangle for the gauge coughing matrix just at one scale.

Cheers
Florian
by FStaub
15. Jan 2020, 21:22
Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
Topic: Unphysical Goldstone bosons in SPheno
Replies: 2
Views: 4461

Re: Unphysical Goldstone bosons in SPheno

Hi,

non-physical states which should be ignored in the SPheno output must have PDG-Nr 0

Cheers,
Florian
by FStaub
15. Jan 2020, 21:20
Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
Topic: Rank mismatch error
Replies: 1
Views: 3587

Re: Rank mismatch error

HI,

Fortran doesn't like Arrays of dimension (1,1), because they are just a scalar at the end. Thus, instead of a rotation matrix, a single phase is sufficient. Check for instance the models with vector-like quarks how to define phases instead of rotation matrices for particles.

Cheers,
Florian
by FStaub
15. Jan 2020, 21:18
Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
Topic: Problem solving the EW tadpole equations using Mu and TanBeta
Replies: 4
Views: 4966

Re: Problem solving the EW tadpole equations using Mu and TanBeta

Hi, there are some issues with solving the tadpoles with respect to TanBeta: - Steve Martin only considers tree-level in his primer. Of course, you need to include loops at some point - The SUSY Yukawas are a function of measured quark masses and TanBeta. Thus, solving the tadpoles with respect to T...
by FStaub
15. Jan 2020, 21:11
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Majorana Like mass term for a doublet a fermion
Replies: 1
Views: 3096

Re: Majorana Like mass term for a doublet a fermion

Hi,

M Delta[lef1,lef2] F.F

is forbidden by hypercharge conservation, isn't it?

Cheers,
Florian
by FStaub
15. Jan 2020, 21:09
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: SM,"DiracSpinor::missing: For the following Weyl spinors are no Dirac spinors defined: {dL,uL,eL,vL,dR,uR,eR}"
Replies: 2
Views: 3915

Re: SM,"DiracSpinor::missing: For the following Weyl spinors are no Dirac spinors defined: {dL,uL,eL,vL,dR,uR,eR}"

Hi,

even if this message might be there because of some reason, it shouldn't play a role because it refers most likely to the gauge eigenstates. As long as you are interested in the eigenstates after EWSB and if there is no warning for that set, you should be able to proceed.

Cheers,
Florian
by FStaub
15. Oct 2019, 19:26
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: Confusing output of FermionQ
Replies: 2
Views: 4183

Re: Confusing output of FermionQ

Hi Alex, I guess, somewhere in between. Without checking (because I don't have Mathematica anymore): make sure that SA`CurrentStates is set correct at this stage (i.e. EWSB). It is usually set when calling other functions to perform some calculations, but just after running Start is might be GaugeES...
by FStaub
9. Oct 2019, 21:58
Forum: SPheno, FlavorKit
Topic: Problem with low scale input files
Replies: 1
Views: 3541

Re: Problem with low scale input files

hi,

did you check if the input files contains reasonable numbers for all entries or just zeros at placeholders?

Cheeers,
Florian