Dear Florian,
Your solution works fine, at least for my model.
Thank You.
Antonio
Search found 11 matches
- 17. Jul 2018, 11:22
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Contractions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4492
- 16. Jul 2018, 09:41
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Contractions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4492
Re: Contractions
Dear Florian,
thank You for the effort. I'll see if it works and I'll feedback You of course.
With regards
Antonio
thank You for the effort. I'll see if it works and I'll feedback You of course.
With regards
Antonio
- 29. Jun 2018, 12:49
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Contractions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4492
Re: Contractions
Dear Florian, I have another question regarding the contractions but for a different case. I've implemented a model with left-right symmetry with the following fileds Gauge[[1]]={B, U[1], bminl, gBL,False}; Gauge[[2]]={WL, SU[2], left, g2,True}; Gauge[[3]]={WR, SU[2], right, gR,True}; Gauge[[4]]={G,...
- 23. Jan 2018, 16:47
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Contractions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4492
Re: Contractions
Dear Florian, thanks for the answer. However I am still a bit confused. Concerning the model (SM+Triplet, Complex) I don't understand why the contraction of the term KHT conj[H].trip.H is conj[H[{lef1}][{gen1}]] Delta[lef1, lef2] Delta[lef2b,lef3] H[{lef3}][{gen3}] trip[{lef2, lef2b}][{gen2}] There ...
- 13. Jan 2018, 19:13
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: Contractions
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4492
Contractions
Dear Florian,
there is a way to check what kind of contractions are needed for a generic interaction term, e.g. Phi.Eta.Xi, if they belong to unusual representations of SU(2) and/or SU(3)?
Thanks
Antonio
there is a way to check what kind of contractions are needed for a generic interaction term, e.g. Phi.Eta.Xi, if they belong to unusual representations of SU(2) and/or SU(3)?
Thanks
Antonio
- 9. Nov 2017, 21:57
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3637
Re: sextet implementation for 331 model
Can this create a problem when I ask for the UFO output?
Best
Antonio
Best
Antonio
- 9. Nov 2017, 17:48
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3637
Re: sextet implementation for 331 model
Dear Staub, still having some problems with the parameters.m file. CheckModelFile Checking model files: Found problems. Main file: ok. Particle file: ok. Parameter file: buggy ModelFile::UnknownKeywordParameter: Unknown keyword Symmetry in parameter file. Symmetry::obsolete: Note, the Definition of ...
- 27. Oct 2017, 14:48
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3637
Re: sextet implementation for 331 model
Dear Staub,
thanks for the suggestion, I've solved the problem. I don't need the RGs at the moment but I'll keep in mind the issue.
Thanks again
Antonio
thanks for the suggestion, I've solved the problem. I don't need the RGs at the moment but I'll keep in mind the issue.
Thanks again
Antonio
- 26. Oct 2017, 14:14
- Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
- Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3637
sextet implementation for 331 model
Dear Staub, I'm trying to implement all the possible interaction terms in the minimal 331 model, including the sextet ones. Gauge[[1]]={B, U[1], xcharge, g1,False, 0, 1}; Gauge[[2]]={WB, SU[3], left, g2,True, 0, 1}; Gauge[[3]]={G, SU[3], color, g3,False, 0, 1}; ScalarFields[[1]] = {rho, 1, {rhopp, r...
- 23. Nov 2016, 10:17
- Forum: Output of SARAH
- Topic: One-Loop Tadpoles
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2761
Re: One-Loop Tadpoles
Thanks a lot for the clarifications.
But what about the rotation matrices for the other scalars that I have, i.e. pseudoscalars, charged Higgses and squarks?
They are treated as rotated fields so their mass matrices are not the identity, right?
Best
But what about the rotation matrices for the other scalars that I have, i.e. pseudoscalars, charged Higgses and squarks?
They are treated as rotated fields so their mass matrices are not the identity, right?
Best