Search found 11 matches

by antonioc
17. Jul 2018, 11:22
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Contractions
Replies: 8
Views: 4492

Re: Contractions

Dear Florian,
Your solution works fine, at least for my model.
Thank You.

Antonio
by antonioc
16. Jul 2018, 09:41
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Contractions
Replies: 8
Views: 4492

Re: Contractions

Dear Florian,
thank You for the effort. I'll see if it works and I'll feedback You of course.
With regards

Antonio
by antonioc
29. Jun 2018, 12:49
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Contractions
Replies: 8
Views: 4492

Re: Contractions

Dear Florian, I have another question regarding the contractions but for a different case. I've implemented a model with left-right symmetry with the following fileds Gauge[[1]]={B, U[1], bminl, gBL,False}; Gauge[[2]]={WL, SU[2], left, g2,True}; Gauge[[3]]={WR, SU[2], right, gR,True}; Gauge[[4]]={G,...
by antonioc
23. Jan 2018, 16:47
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Contractions
Replies: 8
Views: 4492

Re: Contractions

Dear Florian, thanks for the answer. However I am still a bit confused. Concerning the model (SM+Triplet, Complex) I don't understand why the contraction of the term KHT conj[H].trip.H is conj[H[{lef1}][{gen1}]] Delta[lef1, lef2] Delta[lef2b,lef3] H[{lef3}][{gen3}] trip[{lef2, lef2b}][{gen2}] There ...
by antonioc
13. Jan 2018, 19:13
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: Contractions
Replies: 8
Views: 4492

Contractions

Dear Florian,
there is a way to check what kind of contractions are needed for a generic interaction term, e.g. Phi.Eta.Xi, if they belong to unusual representations of SU(2) and/or SU(3)?

Thanks


Antonio
by antonioc
9. Nov 2017, 21:57
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
Replies: 6
Views: 3637

Re: sextet implementation for 331 model

Can this create a problem when I ask for the UFO output?

Best

Antonio
by antonioc
9. Nov 2017, 17:48
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
Replies: 6
Views: 3637

Re: sextet implementation for 331 model

Dear Staub, still having some problems with the parameters.m file. CheckModelFile Checking model files: Found problems. Main file: ok. Particle file: ok. Parameter file: buggy ModelFile::UnknownKeywordParameter: Unknown keyword Symmetry in parameter file. Symmetry::obsolete: Note, the Definition of ...
by antonioc
27. Oct 2017, 14:48
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
Replies: 6
Views: 3637

Re: sextet implementation for 331 model

Dear Staub,
thanks for the suggestion, I've solved the problem. I don't need the RGs at the moment but I'll keep in mind the issue.
Thanks again

Antonio
by antonioc
26. Oct 2017, 14:14
Forum: Model implementation in SARAH
Topic: sextet implementation for 331 model
Replies: 6
Views: 3637

sextet implementation for 331 model

Dear Staub, I'm trying to implement all the possible interaction terms in the minimal 331 model, including the sextet ones. Gauge[[1]]={B, U[1], xcharge, g1,False, 0, 1}; Gauge[[2]]={WB, SU[3], left, g2,True, 0, 1}; Gauge[[3]]={G, SU[3], color, g3,False, 0, 1}; ScalarFields[[1]] = {rho, 1, {rhopp, r...
by antonioc
23. Nov 2016, 10:17
Forum: Output of SARAH
Topic: One-Loop Tadpoles
Replies: 3
Views: 2761

Re: One-Loop Tadpoles

Thanks a lot for the clarifications.
But what about the rotation matrices for the other scalars that I have, i.e. pseudoscalars, charged Higgses and squarks?
They are treated as rotated fields so their mass matrices are not the identity, right?

Best