Hi Florian, With the latest versions of SARAH, it is difficult to get the Higgs mass in the range [124,126] for SUSY modeles, e.g. for the MSSM and for same benchmark point we get different value: SARAH-4.9.3 m_h=125 SARAH-4.10.0 m_h=124 SARAH-4.14.1 m_h=122 I have sent the input file in your email ...

Hi Florian, With the latest versions of SARAH, it is difficult to get the Higgs mass in the range [124,126] for SUSY models, e.g. for the MSSM and for the same benchmark point we get different value for the Higgs mass: SARAH-4.9.3 m_h=125 SARAH-4.10.0 m_h=124 SARAH-4.14.1 m_h=122 Best regards, Dris.

Thanks.
Dris.

I see that B0 is more complected,
You know that for p=0, B0(0,x,y)=-1+Log[x]-xLog[x/y]/x-y, in this case, is it correct to treat B0 as C00 (mu=1GeV)?

Best regards,
Dris.

Hi Florian, There are loop functions have the term Log (m^2/mu^2), where mu is the renormalization scale, e.g. C00 which is defined in SPheno as C00m = ((-m1 + m3)*((m1 - m2)*(m2 - m3)*(-3 + 2*Log(m1)) - & & 2*m2**2*Log(m2/m1)) + 2*(-m1 + m2)*m3**2*Log(m3/m1))/ & & (8.*(m1 - m2)*(m1 - m3)*(m2 - m3))...

Thanks a lot for this clarify.

Dris.

The input and output spectrum have been sent to your email because I could not attach them, take a look on them please.

Best regards,
Dris.

Thanks a lot,

How about the fact that is a O(100%) correction.
Best,
Dris.

Hi Florian,

How can explain the deference between m_A in the input and m_A in the output (e.g. 449 GeV and 213 GeV, respectively).

Best,

Dris.

Thanks a lot.

Dris.